It would be reasonable to say that there is confusion by Manly residents of the terms 'boarding house' vs 'affordable housing' due to the areas long history of boarding house accommodation. So here's some quick background: Under the NSW SEPP (State Environmental Planning Policy) legislation, which overrides local council's Local Environment Plans, new types of housing have been allowed in an attempt to overcome Sydney's housing crisis. These include 'New Generation' Boarding Houses and housing for seniors This type of housing has been referred to as 'affordable' but is not to be confused with social or crisis housing provided by the Department of Housing and others. Because the cost of land, and limited floor space ratios allowed with these developments within Manly, we are in effect talking about “Studio Rooms” not the old-style boarding house accommodation. $350 per week rent for a self-contained room with kitchenette & en-suite bathroom is targeting quite a different group of residents – fulfilling the need of accommodation for international students, young professionals and maybe even those in-between marriages! To get these types of developments moving quickly, the State Government has made them very attractive to developers with a number of usual taxes and Section 94 contributions removed. The policy also allows for smaller rooms, a limited need for providing car parking spaces and other amenities than would usually be required for a new development. Current examples of DAs for Boarding Houses include: 323 Sydney Road, Manly - 14 studios (no car park spaces) 135 Griffiths St, Balgowlah - 17 studios 112 Sydney Rd, Manly, 21 studios (6 car spaces) 120 Pittwater Rd, Manly, 10 studios (no parking) * (*No 120 Pittwater Rd was recently approved by MIAP following two years of to-ing and fro-ing. Although no car parking spaces have been provided, it was an agreement that residents would not be entitled to Resident Parking Permits.) To address the issue Manly Council recently made changes to its LEP in the hope of adding more controls to the developments, although, of course, at the end of the day it's the State Government's SEPP that has precedent. This LEP is currently on exhibition.
8 Comments
Lee Murrell
28/8/2013 10:50:46 am
Parking> There is little or No parking on these proposed dwellings.
Reply
Manly Resident
25/3/2014 04:44:09 am
Approval is one thing, Candy, but who monitors these developments to ensure they are affordable and are being used for the purposes approved. Take the 'boarding house' MyStarHome at 174 Old Pittwater Rd, which appears to be functioning as executive serviced apartments, not the boarding house for which it was approved, a development only a few years old. I can book an executive room on their website for 7 days for $440; I can also make the same booking through lastminute.com.au. A direct phone call gets the the same result. Boarding houses are not for short term rental; in fact 3 months is the minimum under legislation, supported by Council's own literature. Are boarding rooms really being provided to those in need of affordable rent?
Reply
Confused
26/3/2014 04:38:23 pm
You note that Section 94 contributions have been removed, yet MIAP minutes 15 November 2012, 17(2US01) for 120 Pittwater Rd, states a Section 94 contribution of $69,677.55 is to be paid to Council prior to the release of a Construction Certificate." Why is this condition imposed for this development?
Reply
Manly Resident
26/3/2014 04:30:49 pm
Dear Candy, you note that Section 94 contributions have been removed, yet MIAP minutes 15 November 2012, for 120 Pittwater Rd Manly reads:
Reply
Manly Resident
26/3/2014 05:43:52 pm
Candy, I also note that you specifically cite international students as intended beneficiaries of the affordable housing policy. AHSEPP does not refer to that specific cohort, and I do not think most taxpayers would agree with subsidised developments with fewer development controls for international student accommodation and not for local students in real need. Indeed there are current investigation into the misuse of Affordable Housing for this purpose. I hope that when approving 120 Pittwater Rd as affordable housing that Council didn't consider this to be a suitable use?
Reply
Manly Resident
26/3/2014 04:31:07 pm
Dear Candy, you note that Section 94 contributions have been removed, yet MIAP minutes 15 November 2012, for 120 Pittwater Rd Manly reads:
Reply
Manly Resident
26/3/2014 04:36:44 pm
Dear Candy, you note that Section 94 contributions have been removed, yet MIAP minutes 15 November 2012, 17(2US01) for 120 Pittwater Rd, states a Section 94 contribution of $69,677.55 is to be paid to Council prior to the release of a Construction Certificate." Why is this condition imposed for this development?
Reply
Manly Resident
14/3/2015 12:31:43 pm
Hi Candy
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorCandy Bingham, Deputy Mayor & Manly Ward Councillor on Northern Beaches Council. Background in marketing, public relations and community engagement. Author of five business books. Former Lady Mayoress of Sydney. Aka Candy Tymson. ........................................
View Videos
|