Although the development deed for the construction of the Manly Oval Car Park was cancelled promptly by the new administrator of the Northern Beaches Council, the matter of the outcome of the Whistler Street site has hung in the balance for many months while the Council undertook to negotiate with the successful tenderers, Built Athas.
 
It has recently been confirmed that the negotiations have stopped, and the Council has cancelled the development deed for the project, which was inexplicitly linked to the flawed Manly Oval Car Park Plan.
 
While it may be reasonable for Built Athas to claim their expenses in relation to the terminated contract (which was hastily pushed through by the Liberal bloc on the Manly Council prior to amalgamation), the organisation was also claiming for loss of profits, believed to be a figure of around $45m, which was considered unreasonable.
 
Built Athas cancelled the negotiation process, and no further action will be taken by Council at this stage.
 
This effectively terminates the debacle that was known as the Manly2015 Plan and a five year battle by Good For Manly to stop the highly-flawed projects.

In the meantime Save Manly Oval Alliance is preparing a submission to have Ivanhoe Park, including Manly Oval, listed on the State Heritage Register with the view to protect this area from any future development.

This follows an extensive investigation into the process undertaken by the former Manly Council which was headed by General Manager Henry Wong.  Mayor Jean Hay and her Liberal bloc of councillors should also be held accountable for allowing the project to proceed. They continued to ram it through despite continued warnings by independent experts that it was fatally flawed.

The cost of cancelling the car park project contract with Abergeldie was $580,000 plus an initial contractual payment of $200,000.  Add to this more than $500,000 spent developing the project including consultants reports, traffic studies and environmental assessments, interest payments together with the recent independent reports that led to the scrapping of the car park at $94,000 and the total known cost is $1.5m.  However the money lost abandoning the project was nothing compared to what it would have cost if this flawed project had gone ahead.

The Northern Beaches Council has undertaken to release the two independent reports by Ernst & Young and Value Networks, which were commissioned to investigate the matter. However, this is not likely now until August as negotiations continue with Built & Athas.  It is expected that these reports will vindicate independent Councillors Candy Bingham (Good For Manly); Barbara Aird & Hugh Burns; (Manly Independents) and Cathy Griffin (Greens) who fought long and hard against these developments, in addition to the Good For Manly Association and Save Manly Oval Alliance.

Whistler Street Redevelopment Still On the Table
The termination of the former Manly Council Development Deed for the redevelopment of the Whistler street site, including the Library, is still unresolved. The Northern Beaches Council will enter into a six month Negotiations Deed with Built & Athas,  who won the tender to redevelop the site.

The purpose of this ongoing negotiation period is to find a "mutually satisfactory outcome" in the hope of avoiding a lengthy and complicated dispute with the developer.

During this time Council proposes to review "identified issues including parking, design, value for money, traffic flows, library, approvals required, community participation and procurement considerations".

So the focus now is on the future of the Whistler Street site. What would you like to see happen?

 As reported in the Manly Daily, Marlins Vice President Anthony Bergelin confirmed that the lodged development application for the car park showed a reduction in the size of the playing field by 3.5m, which is totally unacceptable.

With the size of the oval already at its minimum, this major change will make the playing area unworkable according to the Merlins.

Quoted in the Manly Daily Anthony Berlin said it was the Club's intention to meet with the Northern Beaches Administrator and the independent consultants reviewing the process to "outline some very concerning aspects of the development process".

In the meantime the Oval looks like a bog with the $millions spent on works to install a detention tank earlier this year seeming to only exasperate the condition of the ground, as the recent photos below clearly show. 

An independent report on the Oval Car Park and Whistler Street redevelopment plans, pushed so vehemently  by the then Mayor Jean Hay and General Manager Henry Wong against strong community opposition, is expected to come to the next Northern Beaches Council meeting on 9th August, which will be held at Mona Vale.

 Further, Dick Perssons, the Administrator of the new Northern Beaches Council, has commissioned Ernst & Young and Value Network to facilitate an independent review of the projects, following continued concerns raised by Good for Manly, the Save Manly Oval Alliance and hundreds of concerned citizens.

This independent review was announced just days after submissions closed for the Development Application of the Oval Car Park, which in turn was lodged just two days before Manly Council was officially amalgamated.

Concerns Over Lack of Process
Over the past four years Good For Manly has raised serious concerns about the way in which Manly Council undertook the process of developing the Manly2015 Masterplan which originally proposed a 760 space car park under Manly Oval and the 99 year lease to a developer of the Whistler Street car park site.

On the 12 April, behind closed doors and with no pubic notification, the Liberal majority on the council voted for a 500 space car park  (not 760) and the 99 year lease of both the Whistler Street car park AND library sites.  The redevelopment proposal was new to the Councillors and was nothing like the submissions made during the Expressions of Interest process, in fact some would argue it was a 'non-confirming tender'. It had had no public exhibition for feedback,  was quite different from anything previously exhibited and the proposed development exceeds the current height limit for the site.

Non Compliant Running of Meetings
Add to this two years of complaints to the Office of Local Government (OLG) by Clr Candy Bingham that the General Manager, Henry Wong, was  systematically refusing to put legitimate motions on the business paper - and you get an idea of just how dodgy the process has been.

In the business paper for the Northern Beaches Council meeting on 7th July, (see copy below) a number of letters from the OLG addressed to Mr Wong, dating back to June & July 2014 , are attached. These clearly state that the Council's Code of Meeting Practice was not compliant with statutory requirements and needed to be updated.  It never was, and the GM continued his practice of rejecting legitimate motions.  

In addition the OLG's letter dated 10/6/16 addressed to the interim General Manager of the  Northern Beaches Council raises serious issues in relation to the meeting of 12 April which was held in the absence of the public to consider tenders concerning Manly2015 Masterplan.

​It is pleasing  that the new Administration is taking the matter seriously by commissioning an independent assessment.   The final report is expected early August.  

In the meantime  the DA process for the Oval Car Park will  continue with independent consultants Fox Partners assessing the submissions on behalf of Council. Their report will be peer reviewed. 

The high level of open and transparent government now operating under the new Council is a joy!

On Sunday 5th June, a Public Meeting was held to review the Development Application for the Oval Car Park.
You can view the presentations below.  Submissions close 1 July.  DA 116/2016 - send to [email protected]

As of 20/6/16, 383 submissions have been received, 335 against the car park and 48 supporting the project.
In addition the Save Many Oval Alliance, as result of a fighting fund which was supported by local residents and businesses, commissioned independent exports to review various aspects of the DA including heritage, traffic, urban design and flooding issues.  A copy of their submission is below and well worth a read.

Other Submissions, both for and against,  can be viewed on the Council's website here. Once you have ticked the disclaimer - select DA 116/2016.

We saw "people power" at its very best  in Manly last Sunday afternoon.
​
Despite 150 kph winds and torrential rain approximately 300 concerned locals turned up at a church hall for a "Save Manly Oval" public meeting.

 It seemed ironic that a meeting raising concerns about a 500 space car park to be built under a reinstated Manly Oval, was in progress while Manly Oval was actually flooded, particularly around the area where the new detention tank had been installed by Council earlier this year.

Expert after expert informed the meeting about major concerns in relation to the DA which was lodged the day before Manly Council was amalgamated into the new Northern Beaches Council.

The proposed $28m cost was dismissed by experts claiming the cost would be closer to $45-50m. Traffic experts explained the impact of reducing Sydney Road into one through lane in both directions, and the issue of there being no break-down area.  (That afternoon a truck broke down in Sydney Road . Under the proposed new arrangement it would have totally blocked and stopped the traffic proceeding into Manly for hours causing traffic jams likely as far as the The Spit.)  And what about emergency vehicles?   How are they supposed to access this major road in an emergency?

A proposed roundabout at Eustace Street simply will not work, the gathering was told.  Dozens of buses, trucks and the dual carriage Sydney Water Sewage trucks which use Sydney Road daily, will be unable to negotiate such a tight turn.

But then there was the flooding issue.  As torrential rain fell on the roof of the hall, and water was gushing down Sydney Road at a great rate, the sober reality of building an underground car park, in a flood plain at the bottom of a steep hill, sent shivers up the spine.  And the DA does not allow for a 1 in 100 year flood, in fact the DA falls well short of the requirement.

For many the reality that the existing historic oval will be completely demolished, with road barriers, entry portals, ventilation stacks, public toilet amenities, and other bulidings blocking the existing vista of the oval from Sydney Road, came as a shock.  For years they had been told by Council that the oval would be reinstated in its former glory, but the harsh reality of what is required to service and ventilate a large underground car park means that in fact this will be far from the case.  Even the historic Merritt Memorial gateway (erected in 1927) which now proudly provides the entrance to the oval, will be relocated further away - with the toilet amenities as its backdrop.

​But that's not all .....

The DA plans clearly show the relocation of the picket fence reducing further the playing field, which is already short of desired length.   This raises serious safety issues, particularly for the rugby players where strict rules apply in relation to the size and standard of the playing surface.  The Manly Marlins, who have played on the field for 133 years, have  now lodged a submission outlining their concerns.  (A copy can be viewed the end of this post).

(A recent tongue in cheek cartoon in the Manly Daily by Buddy Ross, captured this concern well.)

The final presentation was by former CEO of Wilson Parking, Craig Smith.  With more than 30 years experience in building and operating major car parks all over Australia, he left no doubt that the location of the Oval Car Park simply would not work.  It was too far away from the CBD and beach, the revenue projections were way out and the operational costs would be very high.  Northern Beaches ratepayers were looking at  huge annual ongoing losses that could never be recouped.

So why is this flawed plan even been considered?  That's a question Good For Manly has been asking the former five Liberal Councillors on Manly Council,  and Local Member Mike Baird, for four years.

The Save Manly Oval Alliance (SMOA) has recently been formed to continue the fight against the Oval Car Park proposal. Already close to $20,000.00 has been raised in a fighting fund which is being used to engage experts to prepare  reports against the Oval Car Park DA and engage legal counsel.  The Environmental Defenders Office has taken on the case on behalf of the SMOA, and the advice of a leading barrister sought.

What Can You Do?

Two things:

1.  Put in a submission against the Oval Car Park DA No.116/2016.  Send your submission to [email protected] before July 1.

2.  Consider making a donation to the Save Manly Oval Fighting Fund.

Details on how to make a submission and how to make a donation are on their website. 
​Save Manly Oval Alliance
​

A public meeting to give locals the opportunity to hear from experts on the many major concerns relating to the Oval Car Park development application, will be held on Sunday (June 5) at the St Mary’s Parish Hall, Cnr Whistler and Raglan Streets, Manly at 2pm.  (More details here).
 
Arranged by the Save Manly Oval Alliance the meeting is expected to attract hundreds of concerned residents many of  whom have been fighting against the Manly Oval Car Park proposal since 2012.
 
“Save Manly Oval Alliance is seeking legal advice on how the process has been handled by the former Manly Council which pushed through this DA just days before the amalgamation was announced”, said President Jack Steggall.
 
“In the meantime we  have only until June 17 to lodge submissions against the many issues associated with this controversial DA”, he explained.
 
According to the Alliance, who are engaging independent experts to prepare reports on the various aspects of the DA, there are serious flaws with the oval car park plan.

PLEASE SEND IN A SUBMISSION - See Below for Key Points

How To Oppose Manly Oval Car Park Development Application
 
1.   Email your submission to:  [email protected]
2.   Quote DA 116/2016
3.   There is no set format for submissions. Cover the points that concern
      you the most. See list below for ideas.   Object to the DA and ask the
      Joint Regional Planning Panel reject it. 
4.   Include your full name and address for verification purposes.
5.   Submissions close 17th June – so don’t delay!

Independent Experts Have Identified the Following Issues:
Heritage

• Council's application for Development Consent asserts the building is not an item of environmental heritage, but Ivanhoe Park, including the Oval, is listed by Council as a local heritage item.
• The seamless green space of public recreation land of adjacent Gilbert and Ivanhoe Parks, committed for public use, will be ruined by above-ground concrete barriers along Sydney Road near the entry and exit to the commercial car park.
• Above ground lift towers, stair wells, gateways and a future cafe will intrude into the horizontal parkway green space. Elevated pathways above the entry and exit portal will also intrude into the horizontal landscape flow.
• Moving the Ozzie Merrett Memorial Gateway away from the main oval relocated to entry to the bicycle ramp, separated from the oval by the new public toilets.

 
Sports and Public Recreation

• The DA plans will jeopardise the uses of the oval. At particular risk is Grade Rugby because roadways and pedestrian pathway works will intrude onto the Oval concourse and cause the picket fence to be moved inwards at least 3 metres likely making the Rugby playing surface too small for Rugby.
• The cricket boundary will also be shortened to even less than its current short distance.
• The Oval's playing surface is likely to be compromised by a part concrete, part turf foundation.
• It is likely that the construction will actually require lifting the elevation of the playing surface of the Oval, because the DA allowances for depth of the car park are inadequate. An elevated playing surface and surrounding new constructions will destroy the amenity of the village green oval.

 
Public Safety

• The South Eastern length of the oval concourse will be narrowed affecting access by Emergency Services vehicles. This will remove a key access point for emergency ambulances, police and fire vehicles, thus putting public safety and players' safety at risk.
• The design of changes to Sydney Road create serious traffic safety risks. Traffic flow downhill heading East will be narrowed to one lane and confront a roundabout situation, with visual obstructions. Also the configuration of lane weaving, splitting and merging is hazardous.

 
Roads and Traffic Impact

• Unacceptable congestion and safety issues arise for Sydney Road from Belgrave Street, Manly to Fairlight. This is caused by unacceptably complex and dangerous entry and exit portal and tunnel on Sydney Road, the major entry and exit point to Manly. The loss of through lanes in Sydney Road, a roundabout, tunnel and walls create unacceptable line of sight visual and navigational driving hazards.       
                                                      

Roads and Traffic Impact cont.

• Traffic blockage knock-on effects will be even more widespread across Manly than are now evident on busy weekends in particular.
• Traffic will seek alternative neighbouring roads, such as Lauderdale Avenue and White Street, Fairlight Street and Griffith Street, Raglan Street and Birkley Road, more than those roads and their neighbouring roads are designed for.
  
  

Non Compliance with Mandatory Standards

• Several breaches of the Building Code of Australia, including inadequate distances inside thecar park to fire escape exits and ventilation. Also, unacceptable egresses from stairwells to roadways.
• The driveway and cycleway entries and exits to the car park are more than 200mm below the 1 in 100 year flood level, let alone the freeboard level mandated by the Manly LEP 2013, which is a further 500mm higher, so that in a severe rainfall event, the car park will fill with water, with consequent damage to parked cars and and the risk of drowning anyone unfortunate enough to be caught in the car park. Public liability insurance will be impossible to obtain.

Environment

• The car park will have several exhaust emission vents. No analysis has been made of the health and environmental impacts of exhaust emissions from these vents. No analysis has been made of the noise impact of these vents on users of the oval and on neighbours.
• Forecasts of higher intensity storm and seawater surge events have not been taken into account. The likelihood of flooding and environmental damage from acid-sulphate run-off is greater than published in the DA.
• Increased exhaust emissions from the car park vents are not quantified plus extra noise and exhaust emissions from traffic blockage on Sydney Road are not quantified
• There will be significant underground water diversions, less natural absorption for storm water because of the size and impervious car park and its roof, creating unknown impacts on nearby buildings and infrastructure, and on the natural subterranean environment and trees.

 
Financial Analysis

• Costings and revenue estimates for the car park are seriously flawed and will be a significantly larger cost on Northern Beaches ratepayers.
• The total capital expenditure costs have not been published; the items excluded from the costing have not been identified or costed. The published cost of $27.8 million is inconsistently and significantly low compared to industry standards.
• The potential magnitude of financial risks from capital and recurrent over-spend to Northern Beaches ratepayers has not been investigated.
• Operating revenue estimates are grossly excessive and operating costs plus interest are grossly underestimated. This leads to an annual operating loss.
• No business case consistent with this DA for the Manly economy, particularly the retail traders, has been published.

 
Breach of DA Processes

• Council submitted two alternative plans for Sydney Road; one with a roundabout at Eustace Street, but another sent to neighbouring residents without that roundabout. Council must propose only one DA, not alternative plans.

 
For More Information go to:  Save Manly Oval Alliance.   www.SaveManlyOval.com.au
 

The Save Manly Oval Alliance has now briefed the Environmental Defenders Office which is obtaining senior legal advice about the strength of a legal challenge and the likely outcome against the Oval car park development. This course is looking very positive.
 
In addition experts have now been engaged to contribute to a substantial submission that is being prepared, addressing the development application for the Oval Car Park.  (Submissions close June 17, 2016 and can be sent to [email protected])
 
A Public Meeting is being organised for Sunday 5 June, 2pm at the St Mary’s Parish Hall, corner Raglan and Whistler Streets, Manly. This will provide the opportunity for residents and concerned locals to hear first-hand from leading experts on the issues of flooding, traffic, heritage and why a car park in this location simply won’t work. 
 
Fighting Fund
In addition to very generous donations from our local residents, the business community has now come on board following a briefing meeting last week.  It is anticipated that $40,000.00 will need to be raised.  The Fighting Fund has already raised around $20,000.  Please support the campaign by donating at www.savemanlyoval.com.au
 
Representation has also been made to the newly appointed Administrator of the Northern Beaches Council.

The Alliance continues to grow in support.  We can still stop this crazy plan!

Independent traffic studies have clearly shown that the proposed 500 space car park this will result in traffic chaos in Manly's CBD and surrounding areas of Fairlight and Balgowlah.  The car park, which is possible due to the 99 year lease of the Whistler Street car park and Library sites for redevelopment, will only provide a minimal number of additional parking spaces, further away from the CBD. 

It is a high-risk and expensive plan that will change the character of our historic Manly Oval for ever. The old car park and Library in Whistler Street are to be demolished for shops, apartments, offices and a new library on the 5th & 6th floor resulting in a major loss of ground floor community space.

FUNDS ARE URGENTLY NEEDED TO:

1. Take legal proceedings in the Land & Environment Court challenging the validity of Council's tendering process for the Manly Oval car park and the Whistler Street car park and library site.

2. Challenge the Development Application for the Oval Car Park.  Experts in traffic, heritage, hydrology and the environment will be engaged to prepare expert reports for the Joint Regional Planning Panel who will be making the decision on whether the project proceeds.

3. Pay legal fees to the Environmental Defenders Office to pursue these cases.

Your support will save our Manly Village and unique Oval. 

TOGETHER WE CAN STOP THIS!
Please help by Making A Donation - NOW.

WHO IS BEHIND THE FIGHTING FUND?
The challenge will be mounted by the Save Manly Oval Alliance  (SMOA) which is an incorporated community association.
www.savemanlyoval.com.au

President: Jack Steggall, former local solicitor
Vice President:  Jeremy Bingham, former Local Government Lawyer & former Lord Mayor of Sydney
Secretary:  Roger Freney, economist and formerly  Commonwealth Treasury
Treasurer:   Ian Jones, Chartered accountant

Supporters include:  Three former Mayors of Manly (ie Peter McDonald, Sue Sacker & Judy Mellows); former Local Member of Manly, David Barr; John Ferrarin former Director of JWT Partnership to name a few.  See list here   .. its impressive.

​It is very clear that the decision had already been made before the Councillors formally voted on Tuesday night on the successful tenderers for the Oval Car Park and Whistler Street site. Otherwise how can you explain the detailed information board being erected in Whistler Street on Friday morning?

Whether you agree with the proposals or not, you have a right to expect that due process will be followed.
 
From day one, this has not been the case with the Liberal-led Manly2015 Plan.

• Time and time again legitimate Notices of Motion lodged by the non-Liberal councillors have been illegally refused by the General Manager and not put on the agenda.

• Relevant information and important reports have been withheld.

• The Local Government Act has been flaunted.

• Pleas to the Local Member, Mike Baird, have been to no avail.

• Ongoing complaints to the Office of Local Government have simply been filed, and no action taken.

• A formal complaint lodged with the Minister of Local Government was brushed aside.

Then we had the tender process …
Tenders closed on 15th March.
On the 30th March a last minute (unscheduled) 20 minute presentation was given by the General Manager on the recommended tenders to Councillors saying the staff report had been finalised.
 
An extraordinary meeting was called for Tuesday 12th April.  Councillors were given notice on Thursday 7th April that they could view the tenders (massive documents) before the Extraordinary meeting the following Tuesday.  Councillors were required to sign not one, but two confidentiality agreements.
 
But this week was the absolute pits ….
 
On the night of the meeting, the general public were refused access to the Council Chambers to hear the start of the meeting.  Although a closed session was proposed none the less the law states that it’s the Councillors who decide, not the General Manager, and that a vote needs to be taken to go into closed session at the start of the meeting.  This was not done.

Rangers refused access to some 80 local residents who turned up to hear the debate.  The police were called.  The meeting went ahead with the blinds closed and the doors locked. Attempts by the non-Liberals for the correct procedure to be followed were refused.

That wasn’t the end of it.
Although the meeting was in ‘closed session’ and therefore I am not permitted to report on what was discussed in the meeting, I don’t think you have to be Einstein to work out how the vote went – based on statements made by the four non-Liberal Councillors (Candy Bingham, Barbara Aird, Cathy Griffin and Hugh Burns) prior to the meeting and the ongoing recorded stand by the five Liberal Councillors led by the Mayor Jean Hay.
 
Councillors were told there was no opportunity for them, or the public, to make comments or suggestions about the winning tenders but that any feedback could be made at the time of the Development Application.  (This is exactly what was done with the Indoor Pool complex and we all know how well that has gone).
 
A rescission motion, signed by all four non-Liberal Councillors, was lodged after the meeting at 10.06pm by email.  But it was refused on the basis that the tenderers had already been notified.  (Not sure that a phone call to tenderers after 9pm is usual business practice?)
 
Then to add insult to injury ….
The very next day the winning tenders were announced on Manly Council’s website with substantial photographs, copy and a fly-though video which had not even being seen by the Councillors!

Two days later Council staff were erecting an elaborate information board in Whistler Street with all the details about the Oval Car Park and Whistler Street winning tenders.   That’s two days later … you think they would at least have had the decency to pretend the final decision was made by the full council and allow some time to look as though everything hadn’t been pre-prepared and ready to go.

As I said, democracy is dead in Manly.  The announcement of council amalgamations is expected to be in the next 10 weeks – what a mess the new Council will be left with.
 
But it is not over.  The Save Manly Oval Alliance has committed to fight the decisions firstly at the Development Application stage, and then in the Land & Environment Court if necessary.  They have my full support. 

​Proposed changes to Sydney Road to accommodate the Entrance and Exit Ramps for the Manly Oval Car Park​ will be a disaster according to local experts.

The above plan comes from a report commissioned by Manly Council and provided to the three companies invited to tender for the construction of the Manly Oval Car Park, and is the one used by the successful tenderer Abergeldie.  The plan shows the location of:

• The Roundabout (A):  A roundabout is at the intersection of Sydney Road and  Eustace Street to allow cars and buses to exit from Eustace Street in two directions – up Sydney Road and down Sydney Road by using the roundabout. Large vehicles (incl out-of-service and tourist buses, garbage trucks and heavy duty trucks) currently turning right into Sydney Road from Eustace Street will need to negotiate the roundabout to make a right hand turn.
• Entry Ramp (B):  For cars coming down Sydney Road from the West, entry is from the left hand lane and after the chicane and going into the roundabout. The ramp starts in an area that is currently the pavement and pedestrian walkway between Sydney Road and the Oval.  Cars coming from the Eastern Hill, Queenscliff or Manly Flats will turn up Sydney Road at the intersection of Belgrave Street and Sydney Road and after entering the roundabout will turn into the entry ramp (B). 
• Exit Ramps (C and D):  For cars wanting to drive up Sydney Road to go West, they exit the car park using exit ramp C which enters Sydney Road in what is currently a middle lane in Sydney Road.  For cars wanting to drive down Sydney Road towards Manly CBD, they exit on ramp D that enters the left lane of Sydney Road – and for cars that need to turn right into Belgrave Street it will be necessary to very quickly cross into the right hand land.  This arrangement also requires the loss of the pedestrian walkway on the pavement.

It is not difficult to see that this arrangement is totally dumb and will create major traffic problems.  As Sydney Road is deemed a major street, any changes need to be agreed and approved by the  RMS.  If this arrangement is adopted, it will need to be reviewed and approved by the RMS.
 
The following are some of the more obvious problems with this arrangement:

• Loss of the emergency entrance for ambulances into Manly Oval on the South side of the Oval.
• The pavement and pedestrian walkway between Sydney Road and the Oval will need to be replaced with some form of elevated walkway over the exit and entrance ramps.  This could involve stairs that will preclude mothers with prams, disabled people in wheelchairs and people on mobility scooters from walking down the northern side of Sydney Road.
• Due to the encroachment onto Oval land to accommodate the entrance and exit ramps, it is likely that the current walkway around the oval will be lost. 
• There will be only one lane in Sydney Road going West from Belgrave Street.  The creation of a major “pinch point” in traffic flow at the roundabout that will force cars currently using Sydney Road to exit Manly to find alternate routes along the Fairlight/Balgowlah Corridor (ie Lauderdale Avenue and White Street) or go up Raglan Street and into Griffin Street in Balgowlah.
• Loss of on-street parking places on Sydney Road – approximately 100 parking spaces will be lost.
• Safety issue for cyclists using Sydney Road.

 
Perhaps, one of the biggest concerns is that of safety.

• The gradient of Sydney Road coming down from Birkley Road is steep and this places cars and buses in the roundabout at risk because of they will be largely unsighted to down-hill  traffic in Sydney Road because of the barrier wall around the up-hill ramp. Under roundabout rules, once a vehicle has entered a roundabout, it has right-of-way over any vehicle not in the roundabout.  This will create a dangerous situation with eastbound down-hill vehicles having to brake heavily and late to avoid accidents. Accidents will likely increase significantly in number and severity at that location under the proposed roundabout configuration. The situation will be significantly more dangerous during the night when the headlights of cars entering the roundabout from Eustace St will be obscured by the barrier wall around the up-hill ramp.

 
To get more information on the problems associated with this arrangement, go to the review by David Wunder at http://www.savemanlyoval.com.au/traffic-report.html.
 
David Wunder, Ian Sharp and Terry le Roux
Save Manly Oval Alliance
15 April 2016

Manly Council voted last night in closed session to proceed with the Oval Car Park and the 99 year lease of the Whistler Street site.  The plan for Whistler Street involved the total site being redeveloped for retail, commercial, apartments and some library and community space.

​What do you think?

Built Development Group & Athas Holdings (local Chris Athas already owns a number of successful retail & commercial properties in Manly) were the successful tenderer.

All has been done with great haste just 10 weeks before expected announcement of council amalgamations.
No opportunity for Councillors, or the public, to provide comment until the Development Application is lodged.

More details to come .....

Meanwhile the Oval Car Park tender was awarded to Abergeldie Complex Infrastructure for $27,733,747.

Good For Manly Cr Candy Bingham’s motion to discuss the need for a business plan was illegally ruled “out of order” and left off the agenda at Monday’s Manly Council Meeting.  And Cr Bingham’s attempt to have it discussed as a matter of urgency, was also knocked back.

A packed gallery, comprising many representatives of Manly's Resident Precinct groups, expressed their outrage as the Mayor Jean Hay refused to allow the matter to be discussed.
 
The motion, which was to examine the financial viability of the 99 year lease of the Whistler Street site and construction of a 470 space car park under Manly Oval, was prepared by residents of North Harbour Precinct. It had the support of  the majority of the resident precincts and is a requirement of the Office of Local Government.
 
"The council’s existing documentation  is so out of date it was made when the car park was to hold 760 cars, not 470, as is the case now.  The KPMG report also contained significant omissions, such as not taking into account the loss of the $1M a year operating profit currently made by the Whistler St Car Park," Cr Bingham explained.
 
The need is urgent.  The contracts to build the oval car park and redevelop Whistler St are expected to be awarded next month.  At that point, Manly Council and its ratepayers will be locked in, with a penalty fee incurred if the newly merged Council decides to call the projects off.
 
“It’s easy to see why people are upset,” Cr Bingham said.
 
“While the planned 99-year lease and development of the Whistler St site will partly fund the new oval car park, the down side of that deal is that we lose convenient parking in Manly CBD and the potential for a new CBD plaza.  We also lose a key site in Manly at a time when the Council is to be expanded."

“The remaining cost, including any price overruns, or operating losses, will come out of the pocket of Manly businesses and rate payers.”
 
At the end of the day, Manly CBD will lose up to 100 on-street parking spaces and gain a pitiful 40 extra spots further away.  
 
“It’s the ‘why bother’ Car Park,” Cr Bingham said. "Why are the Liberal Councillors hell-bent on pushing this through before the Council is amalgamated?  It's irresponsible".

 With Manly Council poised to lock in the controversial oval car park project, a group of prominent local citizens and experts has formed an alliance in a last-ditch effort to “Save Manly Oval”.
 
The group, Save Manly Oval Alliance, is concerned that the car park project fails on financial, heritage, traffic management and environmental grounds and will deliver an overall gain of only 40 extra car spaces - at the massive cost of an estimated $1M for every new space.
 
“Our aim is to conserve and protect for the public interest, the heritage and environmental values of Manly Oval and its surrounds in the historical context,” Alliance president Jack Steggall said. “We will fight this all the way to the Land and Environment Court if we have to”.
 
While Manly Council describes the car park as being constructed “under” the oval, the Alliance says this is not the case. 
 
“The project would involve digging up and removing the oval along with almost 50,000 cubic metres of its natural soil and sand base. The oval would be replaced with a two-story reinforced concrete car park, with access ramps and ventilation stacks, and a raised playing field on its roof. It would be a complete environmental disaster,” Mr Steggall said.
 
“It is impossible to believe that this proposed redevelopment will in any way retain or even approximate, the iconic status of Manly Oval, in terms of its history, heritage value, natural beauty and usability as a sports oval and recreational area,” he said.
 
Additional concerns the Save Manly Oval Alliance have include:

• The heritage loss of one of the rare “village green” ovals in Sydney.
• Enormous and unnecessary cost to ratepayers.
• Traffic chaos which will be caused by the closure of two lanes in Sydney Rd for the car park’s exit and entrance tunnels. This will cause a choke point on Sydney Rd with widespread knock-on snarls across much of Manly.
• Environmental threats to the Oval and Ivanhoe Park, both above and below ground.
• The loss of convenient CBD parking in the centrally-located Whistler St car park, and the 99 year lease of this landmark CBD site to developers.

Save Manly Oval Alliance is a high-powered group of local residents, which includes experts in local government, civil engineering, accounting, law, infrastructure finance, economics, car park management, town planning and the environment.
 
The Alliance will engage professional experts to assess financial, heritage, environmental, hydrological and traffic issues arising from the oval car park proposal.

Alliance members include:
 
President: Jack Steggall - retired solicitor and longstanding Manly resident
 Vice President: Former Lord Mayor of Sydney and local government expert Jeremy Bingham.
 Secretary: Roger Freney - economist, formerly with the Commonwealth Treasury
Former Manly State MP and Manly Councillor David Barr 
Prominent Manly businessman John Humphrey of Humphreys Newsagency and Book Centre.
Former Manly Councillor and environmental advisor Dr Judy Lambert.
Local Manly rugby identity and former Wallaby Bob McLean.
Civil engineers David Wunder and Ian Sharp.
 
For more information go to savemanlyoval.com.au
or StopManlyOvalCarPark on Facebook.

In addition questionable revenue and construction forecasts; changing of the original plan from a 760 space car park to a mere 500, which effectively only replaces what's existing; lack of transparency and the blatant misleading of the public and councillors in relation to approval processes has left many wondering just why this project is being pushed through on the eve of an amalgamation announcement.

Nonetheless, it is expected that Council will vote to proceed to go to tender on the design and construction of a car park under Manly Oval, and the 99 year lease of the Whistler Street car park for shops and apartments, at its next Council meeting on 14th December, just weeks before the State Government is expected to announce Council amalgamations.

Advice sought from the Environmental Defenders Office (EDO) by Good For Manly clearly sets out the steps which need to be taken by Council before proceeding with such a tender.  Many of these important steps have not been taken.

For example, the current plan relies on major exit and entry tunnels in Sydney Road for access to the Oval car park, and yet the Roads & Maritime Services (RMS), the authority which controls this main road, has not been formally notified of this proposal. In a recent letter from the Acting CEO, Steven Head, he states that RMS "understood that the Council had abandoned the proposal to built a car park under Manly Oval”.

In addition the Oval is part of a Crown Lands Reserve for Public Recreation which can only be used for recreational purposes. Council cannot proceed with a commercial car park unless the Minister for Lands & Water authorises the Oval to be used for the car park as an additional purpose.   DA approval from the Joint Regional Planning Panel is also required.  
 
None of this has been done and yet Manly Council is poised to go to tender.

"It doesn't matter which way you look at it, the Oval Car Park project stinks!" claimed Clr Candy Bingham who has been fighting the plan for the past four years, with hundreds attending public meetings and protest rallies organised by her group, Good For Manly.  

"The oval car park project has already been rejected by two previous Councils and this Council has been in a locked vote of 5 to 4 for most of its term.  With so many questions unanswered, questionable due diligence, lack of due process and pending amalgamations it would be totally irresponsible for this Council to go to tender", she said.

"It should be killed off and buried once and for all”, Clr Bingham added.

PROTESTERS at the No Oval Car Park rally packed the oval grandstand today. 
​
The crowd of more than 600 expressed their anger at Manly Council that their voices had been ignored.  But their rates would be used anyway for a car park that’s high-risk, in the wrong place, and not needed anyway. 

You can view of short video of the event here.

The next step was clear - a call for intervention from a higher power. 
The crowd unanimously endorsed a call to local MP and State Premier Mike Baird to act now to block the oval car park scheme.

Guest of honour on the day was environmental warrior Jack Mundey, who has come out of retirement to help save Manly’s oval and “village green”. In a huge show of support, Mr Mundey pledged to call for a “green ban” on car park development work, if the council persisted with its plan. 

Speakers included Rob Burgess - formerly Manly town planner, a town centres specialist and the man behind the push to list the oval on the State Heritage Register; David Barr - former Manly State MP and councillor; and Candy Bingham - rally organiser, president of Good For Manly, and current Manly Councillor.

Mr Burgess blasted the council for clinging to “a crazy notion that has already been rejected three times”.  Arguments against the car park include the location of the oval in a natural water course and the fact that Sydney Rd is too narrow to be used for the proposed entry and exit ramps. 
“Sydney Rd is a major arterial road and no work can be done on it without the approval of the RMS,” Mr Burgess said.

“To put in car park access ramps, the RMS require a road reserve width of 30m - but Sydney Rd is only 18m wide.  So the ramps can’t go in unless you remove half the rugby field.”

He said that access ramps would also turn the road from four lanes to two, and “create a traffic jam as far up as Balgowlah shops”.  It’s another Kenneth Rd  disaster waiting to happen,” he said, referring to the traffic chaos that has resulted from the council’s swim centre upgrade work. 

Second speaker David Barr also cited the council’s disastrous project management record.
“The swim centre development is a bloated monstrosity with a bloated budget to match” he said. 
“It’s a vanity project for people with big egos.

“These same people are planning to wreck our heritage oval.”  He warned that the oval car park would only be the beginning of the development work, with a club complex for Mounties bowling club and a shopping complex along Belgrave Rd all in the mix. 

Mr Barr called out the Manly Chamber of Commerce, who support the oval car park project, for failing to represent the Manly business community.  “In Manly 70 - 80% of businesses don’t belong to it,” he said.
“It’s a few rich developers - that’s all it is.  “They don’t represent small business. They have another agenda.”

Cr Bingham summed up the mood of the Manly community to the car park plan 
“This is the message that I’ve heard,” she said. “We don’t want it. We don’t need it. We can’t afford it. “So why are the Liberal councillors pushing this so hard?”
​
Cr Bingham said the Good For Manly alternative was to “work with what we’ve got.”
“We can beautify Whistler St car park with green walls, murals, or at least a coat of paint. We can open up the parking area out the front and link it to the Market Plaza and library.  Then we get rid of the ugly fire escape in front of the library, and connect up the whole area in a big plaza. 

“It would cost about $5 M, it wouldn’t destroy anything and it would keep customers and car parking in the right place for local businesses.”

Cr Bingham called on the crowd to support her call for Mike Baird to intervene. Protesters also signed post card to be delivered to the MP begging him to act. An easy course of action for Mr Baird would be to call a moratorium on all major new council projects ahead of council amalgamations to be announced later this year. 

Residents, who were then invited to have their say, ranged from young school student Sofia, to former rugby player Jack Steggall. 
​
The crowd was entertained with music from the band “Ulterior Motive”. And despite terrible weather for the entire previous week, it didn't rain at all. 

The unpopular oval car park and the Whistler St car park re-development  are likely to go to tender next month.  And yet this current, high-risk, plan only provides for an additional 40 car parking spaces in Manly's CBD. Why are the Liberal Councillors pushing this? 

Opposition from residents, businesses (see related story below),  almost all our community precincts and the four non-Liberal councillors, continues to be ignored.  

Or as Mayor Jean Hay summed it up for the public gallery at the August’s council meeting: the more opposition there is the more determined I am to go ahead anyway. 

But despite Mayor Hay's determination not  to represent us, our voices have still been heard.
Several times Cr Hay has said that If it wasn't for Cr Candy Bingham and the Good For Manly team, the oval car park would be built by now.  She means it as a criticism, but really it's an admission that, even in Manly, the council eventually has to listen to the people. 

Unanswered Questions
1. Sydney Rd, where the car park entry and exit ramps will need to be built, is a major road controlled by the RMS. Permission to proceed will be needed from the RMS, but no request has been made from the council so far. Even worse, Sydney Rd - at 18m wide - is way below the 31m road width required by the RMS before access ramps can be approved.  Does the council plan to slice 13m off the oval, grandstand and park? Or are they planning a 'Kenneth Road' solution which locals have found unsafe and unworkable?

2. Manly Council is now claiming that "The Masterplan can be delivered without the need for any long term loan, and will be fully funded by the commercial ratepayers of the Manly CBD and from the long term lease of the new Village Centre site development - the Whistler Street car park site".  Not according to the calculations of an independent report.  The Masterplan will in fact cost us $40 million over the next 20 years! See financial report below.

The Manly community, led by Cr Bingham, has stopped the car park so far.  And we have to act again now, to stop tenders being locked in for a project we don’t want, and don't need.

Good for Manly is holding a protest rally on Sunday 27th September, 3pm at Manly Oval, to give the community a forum to demonstrate the strong opposition to the car park scheme. 


Legendary Enviromental Activist, Jack Mundey, has come out of retirement to support the Manly Community with this fight.

The protest is support by Manly Independents Clrs Barbara Aird and Hugh Burns and Greens Clr Cathy Griffin.
More details here.

This is why:

1. The $40 M car park will provide 40 extra car spaces.  By our calculation that's $1million per space. Clearly not a good use of our money.  (see report below).

2.  The new car park is in the wrong place.  It’s too far from the shops for the elderly, or anyone with small children or lots of gear.  It’s also a long way from the beach. It is likely to be a car park of last resort, after the on-street spaces, and the council’s three other car parks are full. 

3. The project is high risk. Not all the figures are available for public scrutiny but what we’ve seen doesn't stack up. No provision seems to have been made for the entry and extra ramps, the ventilation stacks or the extra cost of building in a flood plain with part of the car park lying under the water table.  No costs have been made public about relocating and reinstating the Cricket and Rugby club's facilities.

4. The debt. Our independent experts say the oval car park will cost about $40M to build. KMPG estimated leasing the Whistler St site will generate about $15M. That leaves a $25M hole. More if the car park runs over budget, or generates less than expected in income. We are already in debt for an major indoor swim centre development which is believed to be  30% over budget.

5. It's our village and our money,  but our voice has not been heard.  There has been no genuine community consultation, the decision-making process has been obscure and important public information has been hidden behind "commercial-in-confidence" claims.  

6. We will lose control of land in the heart of the village. Whistler St car park site, which currently generates around $1m in profit each year, is to be leased for 99 years to pay for the oval car park. Developers are bidding for  high-rise apartments and shops.  We do not want to lose this asset.

What Are the Alternatives?

1.  We can beautify and revitalise Manly village cheaply and without fuss. We don’t need to sell off Whistler St and dig up the heritage oval. Good For Manly supports the plan to limit traffic in the CBD, and re-pave and open up our laneways for cafes, bars and shops.  Lets start by doing that. 

2. We don’t have to pull Whistler St car park down. We can renovate it with vertical gardens or murals, and modernise it including  a new lift.  Lets have the discussion.

3. We can improve the library and surrounds, by removing the ugly external fire-escape and opening up the plaza. Lets have the discussion. 

4..  We can generate more car parking in our CBD, simply by managing our existing car parks better. They are not well sign-posted, so many people don’t even know they are there. As well there is currently a bizarre practice of putting up the “Full” sign, when lots of car spaces are still free. Lets have the discussion. 

If you agree, or would like to know more, be sure to come to the Protest Rally on Sunday, 27th September, 2015.

Want the Council's view?  Go to their website here to see the pretty pictures they won't allow us to show you!

Manly businesses don’t want a car park under the sports oval, nor do they want the Whistler street car park demolished for shops and apartments.

That’s the shock result of  a survey conducted by Good For Manly on attitudes to the Manly CBD masterplan.  

As well as opposition to the oval car park, the survey of over 200 small ground floor Manly businesses found overwhelming opposition to the demolition of the Whistler St car park, and to further pedestrianisation of the CBD resulting in loss of on-street parking and the closure of Sydney Rd.  But the businesses did support the planned Manly Library revamp. 

The results are a surprise, as the businesses’ peak body - the Manly Chamber of Commerce - staunchly supports the oval car park/Whistler St development. 

And businesses that were members of the Chamber of Commerce did look at the project more favourably. But even in the Chamber group support for the oval car park/Whistler St plan ran at less than 50%.  However the Chamber businesses liked the idea of more pedestrian zones and, like the overall group, supported the library redevelopment plan. 

The survey was carried out last month, and involved face-to-face contact with 214 businesses in the Manly CBD. Only ground floor businesses were included, and because contact needed to be made with either the business owner or manager, most large businesses such as banks, pubs and chain retailers like Suzanne, could not take part. 

Businesses were asked to reply “Support”, “Don’t support”, or “Don’t know” to these five questions:

1. Manly Council now plans to build a 500 space car park at Manly Oval to replace the Whistler St car park. The Oval car park will provide a minimal number of additional parking spaces. 
2. Council plans to demolish the Whistler St car park and lease the site for 99 years to be redeveloped for shops and apartments. There will be no public parking on this site. 
3. Council plans to refurbish/rebuild the Library with an additional two floors of community space. 
4. Council plans to remove 100 parking spaces on the street to further pedestrianise Manly’s CBD.
5. Council plans the closure of Sydney Road from Belgrave St to The Corso, and no through traffic in Central Ave, to pedestrianise Manly’s CBD. 

This is the result:

The four independents,  Clrs Candy Bingham, Barbara Aird, Hugh Burns and Cathy Griffin, had lodged a motion to stop any further action on Manly Oval or the redevelopment of the Whistler St car park site.

But that motion has been ruled out of order on the grounds that it contradicts previous council resolutions.

"This is a blatant attempt  to block democracy," Clr Bingham said.  "The council administration is illegally refusing to accept the motion because it doesn't suit them.

"If council resolutions could never by challenged, every single decision the council has made in the last 100 years would still stand. That's just ridiculous."

At stake is the future of Manly CBD with the Liberal majority expected to push through a motion calling for tenders to construct a smaller oval car park and redevelop the Whistler Street site.

If  this is done the two huge projects will be locked in, despite the complete lack of clarity over what the tenders will actually be calling for, and the total absence of community consultation.

“It is an outrage. The whole expressions of interest process was for  a car park that is quite different to what has been promoted to the community and Manly businesses since 2011”, Clr Bingham said. 


"The new car park will only have 470 spaces, not the original 760 - a decision which was made with no consultation, not even with councillors themselves," she said.

"The latest plan does not provide any additional parking, which was a key point of the original proposal, and a very limited increase in areas for pedestrians.  We are losing a locals car park for a tourists car park."

Clr Griffin agreed, saying that the original vision of Manly2015 has been lost, and there was a complete lack of community support for what is proposed now.

Clr Aird criticised the "ongoing lack of openness, accountability, transparency and genuine community consultation" on the biggest project Manly Council has ever taken on.

Clr Hugh Burns said his constituents were completely opposed to public land at Whistler St car park being sold off.  "The public consider it too convenient to demolish," he said.
"It can easily be refurbished.”

Already a number of resident precinct groups have voted against both projects proceeding, and a request for an interim heritage order was lodged last week by former Manly Town Planner Robert Burgess, to protect Ivanhoe Park and the Village Green where Manly Oval is located.

There is expected to be a show-down at Monday night's Council meeting (10/8/15) when the matter is back on the agenda.  A staff report has outlined in glowing terms how successful the Expressions of Interest process  has been but has failed to acknowledge that the latest proposal will not deliver a single additional car parking space for Manly.  The four independent councillors continue to fight the lack of accountability and transparency with the process which started in 2011.

Does anyone really know what the current Manly2015 Plan actually is?

An Interim Heritage Order has been sought from the Heritage Council to protect Ivanhoe Park & Manly Oval as a Heritage Item.

Manly Oval & Ivanhoe Park is listed as an Item of Heritage in the Manly Planning Scheme and no " excavation or development work “ can be undertaken until a Heritage Report is prepared and considered. No such report or consideration has been given although Council is proceeding to call tenders.

Ivanhoe Park & Manly Oval  have significant Heritage & Historic value dating back to before Proclamation as a Park in 1887.

Many significant historical events have occurred on the Oval including the final practice match for the 
Australian Aboriginal Cricket in 1868 prior there departure for a 47 game tour of England. This is additionally significant as they were the first Australian representative team of any sport to tour overseas.

It is believed that Manly  Oval, in its natural context, is the best example in Sydney and possibly Australia of a Public Recreation Oval integrated into a "village" area. For this reason together with the rich history of recorded events which have taken place in the Park, careful preservation and celebration of this place is essential and is currently at serious risk.

Former Manly Council Town Planner and Urban Design Consultant, Rob Burgess, has headed a team of local historians  which have championed the documentation of the heritage significance of Manly Oval in the light of the proposal to build a major car park under the site.

In addition, a community working group has been formed to prepare and lodge a request to the Heritage Council of NSW for the listing of Ivanhoe Park Manly on the State Heritage Register.

This decision was made at the Ivanhoe Park Precinct Committee meeting on 29 July 2015.

The group includes representatives from Ivanhoe Park, Fairlight and North Harbour Precinct committees, Stephen Richards from St. Andrews Church Management Committee, citizens Rob Burgess, David Barr and John Steggell with technical Heritage & Historic advice from Jim Boyce, Shelagh Champion OAM & George Champion OAM. 

What are your memories of Manly Oval?

Locals are alarmed by an Expression of Interest from Woolworths to turn the historic Oval  into a shopping centre with two  levels of parking above ground and the playing fields on top.

 The previously rumoured proposal by Woolworths has now emerged. Their ambitious left-field submission is for a shopping centre similar in size to Stocklands Balgowlah including a supermarket, specialty shops, a stadium/clubhouse and a 1000-space above ground car park.

The sports oval, tennis courts and bowling club will be reinstated seven metres - that's two and a half stories - above ground level. 

“You would think we were in Singapore not Manly. Why would we even consider building a shopping centre on this site?” she exclaimed.

"Not only will we lose the whole of Ivanhoe Park including Manly's beautiful heritage oval, which is crown land, but the new development will gut retail in Manly's existing village centre and destroy Manly's most precious asset - its seaside village feel." Clr Bingham added

“One has to question the connections between Woolworths, the Mounties and  Manly Rugby Club.  And why do the  Liberal councillors seem so determined to push through a car park on the oval site despite major public opposition”, Clr Bingham said.

Since the Manly2015 Plan was first released in 2011, Clr Bingham and many independent experts have questioned the financial validity of the oval car park project stating that the numbers just did not add up.

Other EOI submissions received, which only focused on an underground car park, will no doubt confirm the long-held view that Council has completely under-estimated the cost of building a two level 760 space underground car park for the $34m budget allocated.

Clr Bingham claims that the existing budget will only provide a smaller car park which will, in effect, just replace existing car parking spaces that will be lost due to the demolition of the Whistler Street car park and removal of parking from the streets.

“It’s time this council either scrapped the oval car park plan altogether or shelved it until the next election.  As for the Woolworths proposal, it’s an insult and should be immediately discarded”, Clr Bingham concluded.

Expressions of Interest can be viewed here
Woolworth’s proposal is A-4.

Twelve EOIs were received for the construction of a car park on the Manly Oval site. They were:
AW Edwards; Abergelidie, Built Athas, Cockram Pty Ltd, FDC Pty Ltd, Haslin, Hindmarsh Pty Ltd, Hutchinson Builders, Kane, Michael Campareale (Campareale Holdings Pty Ltd) Richard Crookes Pty Ltd, Woolworths.

Three EOIs were received for the redevelopment of the Whistler Street site on a 99 year lease. They were:
Built Athas, Grengate, Grocon.

Lots of plans of underground car parks, and a number of artist's impressions of what could be redeveloped in Whistler Street, is the bulk of what has gone on public display as a result of the Expressions of Interest (EOI)  process for the sites undertaken by Manly Council.

But if you are looking for costings, the names of submitters linked to the proposals or any rationale - you won't find it.

Manly Council has now released on public exhibition the EOIs received for their controversial Manly2015 Plan to build a car park under Manly Oval, and a 99 year lease for the redevelopment of the Whistler Street car park site.

Due to reasons of 'commercial in confidence', the documents are of little value other than to give locals and Councillors a glimpse of some of the proposals submitted.  You can view here.

The list of submitters is impressive, 15 in total ie 12 for the design and construction of the oval car park and three for the redevelopment of the Whistler Street site.  Submissions for the car park  were received from:
AW Edwards, Abergelidie, Built/Athas, Cockram Pty Ltd, FDC Pty Ltd, Haslin, Hindmarsh Pty Ltd, Hutchinson Builders, Kane, Michael Campareale (Campereale Holdings Pty Ltd), Richard Crookes Pty Ltd and Woolworths.

The three submissions for the redevelopment site were Built/Athas, Grengate and Grocon.

So what's next?

• The public exhibition period closes on 31st July
  
• A Report to Council is expected by August
  
• Successful submitters will be invited to tender - a 28 day process
  
• Tenders expected to close end of September
  
• Report back to Council on recommended tender/s expected by November, 2015.
  

"At this stage even the Councillors have not been given access to the full submissions although I will be pushing to ensure that we get to  view at least the short list of submissions before the report is presented to Council", Clr Candy Bingham said.

"These are  the most significant projects undertaken in Manly for decades and is clearly high risk. The process to date has not filled me with confidence. Given the highly controversial nature of the Plan, it is imperative that the elected councillors are fully briefed before voting on the matter", she said.

"Given IPART is expected to announce the outcome of Council amalgamations in  October one really has to question the rush to go to tenders", Clr Bingham added.

Although many are under the impression that Manly Council has agreed to keep the Whistler Street car park and upgrade the Library - that was last month.  Once again, things have changed.

Following on from a resolution moved by Clr Steve Pickering and Clr James Griffin an Expression of Interest (EOI) progress has commenced for the "opportunity to enter into a long term lease (the maximum term offered is 99 years) with Council to redevelop the strategic site .... generally bounded by Whistler Street, Market Lane and Library Place, Manly".    Submissions close 12th June. 2015.

(Update: 12/6/15 .... At the EOI closing this afternoon, Council received 3 submissions to the EOI for Whistler Street Village Centre Redevelopment and 12 submissions to the EOI for Design and Construct Car Park Beneath Manly Oval.)


Respondents are invited to submit their interests and offers for at least two development scenarios. They are:

1. Redevelopment of the subject site in totality, which will include the building of a new library and offices for Council and in placed in Council's ownership under a separate stratum and with a total useable floor area of approximately 3,000 sq m.

2. Redevelopment of the subject site with the retention of and adding floor space to the existing library.

Although the EOI outlines that submissions should comply with Council's planning controls many believe that to provide the return on investment needed for such a redevelopment that developers would have to 'push the envelope' and a much higher building would need to be approved (or won in the Land & Environment Court).

The fundamental question still remains - why is Council continuing to push a project, which is linked to the creation of the Oval car park, when residents have clearly stated they don't want it and want to retain the more convenient location for parking. In addition,  independent due diligence reports have clearly confirmed that the site would only be viable for developers if Council made the site suitable for the "biggest and best" use scenario