Since September 2011 there has been no further public comment nor consultation by Manly Council and yet the majority of Councillors are about to vote to proceed with this Plan, with only minor modifications.
At its core, Manly 2015 Plan proposes the demolition of the Whistler Street car park, and sale of that site to developers for mixed use and apartments; the demolition & rebuilding of the 18 year old library, the building of a two-storey car park under Manly Oval with entry & exit via Sydney Road, and public domain improvements. The published budget is below but does not include include the additional construction costs such as professional fees, budget blow-outs, relocation compensation or make-good costs, feasibility studies etc. Public Domain $15 million Oval Car Park $36 million Village Centre $35 million (demolish Whistler St. Car Park, build new Library) Manly Swim Centre Upgrade $15 million Council's debt will increase from $17.96 million today to $92 million in 2017/2018. Can Manly afford this Plan? Will the car park under the Oval become a white elephant? Why is Council considering the demolition of assets which are viable such as the Whistler Street car park and the 18 year old library? And why won't the General Manager provide the Councillors with the full KPMG report on the financial viability of the Oval Car Park? If you were on the Board of Directors (which Councillors effectively are) would you vote on $100 million in new capital works without seeing the feasibility study undertaken? Go to our website page to see the latest on the Council's Plan and our alternative idea to rejuvenate, not redevelop, Manly's Village. ========================================================================================= Summary by Councillor Cathy Griffin - 27th October 20, 2011. This is my take on the presentations and discussion held at the Councillor Workshop on Thursday 27th Oct 2011. Please note that the meeting went for approximately 3 hours. No agreement was reached one way or the other and staff were requested to provide more information and another meeting will be held in a fortnight to discuss the issues further once Councillors have had an opportunity to digest all the detail and info presented. Manly 2015 Oval Carpark 1. It was generally agreed that an Option 3 now proposed for the carpark which eliminates the ‘secondary’ entry/exit in Raglan St would resolve the issues raised by the Ivanhoe Precinct and residents in Raglan St. 2. This would save approximately $2mil 3. A pedestrian entry/exit would remain on the Raglan St side of the carpark however it was not clear where this would be located. 4. The entry/exit would be via a ‘slot’ in Sydney Rd. It was not clear if this slot was only on the downhill slope only. 5. There is a ‘lag’ of approximately 3 years for private investment in property improvements in the area assumed to benefit from the location of the new car park and demolition and rebuild of Whistler St. 6. Landscaping of Raglan St between Belgrave and the Steyne was seen as a priority. 7. The consultation period, including recently received submission revealed 440 issues. There were 142 individual submissions 8. Retail tenancies are intended for the underground pedestrian pass from the exit/entry on the Sydney Rd side of the carpark to the Whistler St side. 9. Council has not spoken directly with the Tennis Club, only with the Department of Lands who advised that the Tennis Club had ‘a very long lease’. Council has agreed to discuss the inclusion of the tennis courts in the plan with a view to an entry on Belgrave St and perhaps an increase in the number of car spaces. 10. The Council has not factored in to the financial figures the possibility of a grant from the NSW State Government for ‘park and ride’ spaces in the new carpark. This would mean that 30% of the spaces would have to be dedicated to ‘park and ride’. For 800 spaces this would mean 240 spaces. There was some suggestion that the current 140 ‘long stay’ spaces in the Manly Pacific carpark would move to the oval carpark. It is worth noting that approximately 3500 passengers use the ferries during each peak hour to and from Manly. 11. Council would not be the operator of the carpark but would seek expressions of interest. The current free two hours would remain. 12. Technology is available to ‘manage’ the speed of exiting the carpark from a single entry to minimise any queues forming. 13. The STA stated in their submission that they could not guarantee the continuation of their current services if the plan was implemented as presented. It was not clear if this included the now rescinded proposal along the Steyne. Breakdown of the number of issues Oval car park 36% Whistler St 5% Traffic 23% Sustainable Transportt and Tram 10% (evenly split for and against) Cost 6% Tourist not residents 5% Public Domain 2% Misc 4% Support 5% Library 4% Breakdown of comments postcode origin Manly 2095 71% Fairlight 2094 17% Balgowlah 2093 3% Seaforth 2093 4% Other 5% The concerns and staff responses that were identified were: Environmental – these would be resolved in the detail of the design Traffic – these have been resolved with the removal of the Raglan St entry/exit and the reinstatement of the on street parking and traffic flow from the Eastern hill More cars – removes the parking issues in the CBD Financial Concerns – self funding over time (50 years) Whistler St – opposition to demolition and impact on Manly CBD – new car park built to resolve this Library option – existing library does not meet Library standards for LGA population Traffic from Eastern Hill – no concerns or impacts – resolved Cost and financials – self funding Public domain Residents versus Tourist – both benefit 17. Councillor Burns presented an update on the Tram proposal which now is proposed to go in a ‘loop’ along Pittwater Rd, Belgrave St, East Esplanade, Victoria St, The Steyne, and Carlton St. 18. Concept Plans for the Aquatic Centre were presented. The current swim centre is not “sun safe’ and there are apparently problems with ‘separation’ in the reticulation system. This would be an approximately $15mil project. Expressions of interest would be call to build and operate the new centre which would include and ‘sun safe’ indoor 25m pool, training pool, gym/training room, underground carpark with double the number of spaces currently available, change rooms, shop and other facilities with access from the LM Graham sports fields. Cathy Griffin Councillor Manly Council 28/10/11
7 Comments
Ray Mathieson
30/10/2011 05:15:35 am
How can the Councillors say that the Eastern Hill traffic issues are resolved when they are still considering the "tram" running along East Esplanade and Belgrave St, plus the loop and they are still talking about traffic calming devices in East Esplanade. We want all access routes in and out of the Eastern Hill to remain open, which includes Whistler, The Corso, Steyne/Darley Wentworth and Victoria and improvements to East Esplanade with reduced buses and parking as well as controlled pedestrian access and lights co-ordinated. Ongoing increases in traffic to the AIPM, Quarantine Station Hotel, Sydney Water NHSTP, International College of Management, Manly Hospital ( for the time being), and SHFT site at the Artillery School, plus the new developments at the Catholic Church/Lend Lease sites, suggest that East Esplanade is a critical access point that must be kept free of all future plannned projects, except an improvement to the traffic flow. Trams and traffic calming will not help.
Reply
Tina
30/10/2011 02:16:35 pm
Substandard to say the very least!
Reply
Brendan Condie
31/10/2011 02:46:31 am
I do not believe the traffic matters have been resolved. Can council tell me how, and with whom?
Reply
Don Walker.
31/10/2011 08:11:01 am
WHO DO THE COUNCILLORS THEY ARE TRYING TO HOODWINK WHEN THEY STATE SEVERAL ISSUES HAVE BEEN RESOLVED. BY WHO, CERTAINLY NOT THE RESIDENTS. HOW ANYONE CAN SUPPORT AN UNDERGROUND CAR PARK UNDER MANLY OVAL JUST SHOWS THE LACK OF INTELLIGENCE BY OUR ELECTED COUNCILLORS WHO WERE VOTED IN BY THE RESIDENTS OF MANLY, NOT BY THE TOURISTS. COME ON NEXT COUNCIL ELECTIONS SO WE CAN CLEAR OUT THE COUNCILLORS WHO SUPPORT THIS CARPARK AND THE MANLY 2015 REVAMP OF OUR ROADS.
Reply
deborah mooney
22/11/2011 02:02:32 pm
Manly Councils' motives are to cash in on the Whistler St. airspace to create MORE "low density" living which will require??? car spaces for the unit holders.. They are playing smoke and mirrors. If anyone thinks that it's just simply a matter of them "upgrading" the library and putting in a mini-mall, have a look around at the past demolishing/rebuilding that has been approved under our noses without a peep in the last few years. They want to develop this land to it's fullest to the detriment of our neighbourhood. Our Manly "Village" is a thing of the past and it's time we make a stand to preserve what is left. Goodbye Jean Hay!!! is What I say!!
Reply
Wendy
23/11/2011 05:00:51 am
1. If Manly Swimming Pool is going to be redeveloped anyway, why doesn't the carpark go under the swimming pool redevelopment or playing fields there????? Not much residential on Kenneth Road near the pool, sports fields. Easier and more convenient for residents and Council's costings. Have a tram/shuttle bus from there into Manly Centre.
Reply
Steve
9/12/2011 11:58:13 pm
Wendy, not bad thinking! Kenneth Road could do with re-purposing. It is nice and wide, and, as you say, with few homes.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorCandy Bingham, Deputy Mayor & Manly Ward Councillor on Northern Beaches Council. Background in marketing, public relations and community engagement. Author of five business books. Former Lady Mayoress of Sydney. Aka Candy Tymson. ........................................
View Videos
|